Single-Blind External Peer Review

All manuscripts submitted for publication undergo single-blind, external peer review. The journal is committed to providing its authors a rapid review process with "submission to first decision" time being less than two weeks and "submission to publication" time being about three weeks.

Peer Review Process

After a manuscript is submitted, it is reviewed by a member of the Editorial Board. If the manuscript passes the editorial review, the editor suggests the names of the reviewers to whom the manuscript can be sent for single-blind peer review.

Reviewer Selection

The reviewers are selected on the basis of their area of expertise and interests, their reputation and our past experience with the reviewers. The reviewers are sent an invitation to review the manuscript. If the reviewers accepts the offer to review the manuscript, they are sent the complete manuscript and a Manuscript Review Form.

Reviewer’s Conflict of Interest

In all cases, reviewers are asked to declare any conflict of interest based on the contents of the manuscript. If a conflict of interest exists, the reviewers are requested to decline to review the manuscript.

Peer Review Time

We strive to provide authors with an efficient review process with "submission to first decision" time being less than two weeks. We request the reviewers to help us in reducing the decision time as much as possible by providing the reviews on time. It is very frustrating for authors to wait for months or years to receive reviewers' comments for their manuscript. We request the reviewers to respond promptly to messages from Editorial Office and inform us if they are unavailable for any length of time.

Manuscript Review Form

When a manuscript is sent to the reviewers for evaluation it will be accompanied by a Manuscript Review Form. The reviewers are requested to use the form for reviewing the manuscript. Using a form will save time to review the manuscript and ensure a more structured and accurate review.The Manuscript Review Form has two sections - 'Comments for authors' and 'Confidential comments for Editors'. Anything written in the "Comments for authors" will be sent to the authors. The reviewers can use the section "Confidential comments for Editors" to send any confidential comments to the editors, which will not be transmitted to the authors. Reviewers can submit the completed Manuscript Review Form using 'Submit Peer Review' option on the journal website under 'Submit' tab in the menu.

Peer Review Expectations

Reviewers are expected to provide an objective, critical assessment of the manuscript regarding the concept of the study, relevance to current scientific knowledge, scientific content, language and grammar. Reviewers will be asked to make a recommendation for publishing the manuscript. Please provide reasons for the recommendations. If the manuscript needs changes for improvement before it is accepted for publication, please make suggestions on how to improve it. If the comments are negative, please help the authors improve their manuscript by explaining scientific content or language weaknesses. We do not tolerate any offensive language in the comments. We may edit the reviewer's comments for any errors in facts or language or to remove confidential information.

Peer Review Confidential

The review process is a confidential communication between the Reviewers, Editors, Editorial Staff and the Corresponding author. Please do not discuss any manuscript received for review with anyone not directly involved in the review process.

Decision on Manuscript

Based on the reviewer's comments, the assigned editor will decide about the manuscript's acceptance or rejection. The Editor may decide to 1) accept the manuscript without revisions, 2) invite authors to resubmit the manuscript after minor or major revisions while the final decision is kept pending, or 3) reject the manuscript. When the manuscript review process is complete, reviewers' and editors' comments are sent back to the author with the editorial decision. If the authors are asked to resubmit the manuscript with changes and comments, we may send the revised manuscript and the author's responses to the reviewers for further review.

Privileges for Peer Reviewers

We realize that reviewing the manuscripts poses an extra burden on the reviewer's precious time. Scholars who have reviewed 10 manuscripts for the journal can get a 30% waiver of the standard fee.

Reviewers invited to review 10 manuscripts for the last 12 months can join the Journal's Editorial Board. 

You may check your status as a reviewer at https://www.reviewercentral.org/.

Editorial and Peer Review in Special Cases

International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports follows a single-blind, external peer review policy. In all cases, reviewers will be asked to declare any conflict of interest based on the manuscript's contents. Suppose a manuscript is submitted for publication by the Editor-in-Chief (author of the manuscript). In that case, the Editor-in-Chief will assign the manuscript to an editor who will, without informing the Editor-in-Chief will, transfer the manuscript to another editor. The second editor will make all decisions about the manuscript and communicate the decision to the Editor-in-Chief (author of the manuscript) through the first editor. The first editor will keep the identity of the second editor anonymous from the Editor-in-Chief. If a manuscript is submitted for publication by a member of the Editorial Board, the name of the handling editor will not be disclosed to either the editor (author of the manuscript) or the co-authors. Only the Editor-in-Chief and the Journal editorial staff will be privy to this information. If a manuscript is submitted for publication by a current or past reviewer for the journal, the name of the handling editor will not be disclosed to either the reviewer (author of the manuscript) or the co-authors. Only the Editor-in-Chief and the Journal editorial staff will be privy to this information. Suppose an author submits a manuscript at the same institution as one of the editors. In that case, another editor will handle the manuscript, not at that institution. Suppose a manuscript is submitted by an author who is a family member of the editor or personally or professionally related to the editor (e.g. friend, colleague or student). In that case, another editor will handle the manuscript.