E-ISSN 2534-9821
 
2023, Vol: 7, Issue: 11
7 / 11Current Issue Online FirstArchiveAims and ScopeAbstracting & IndexingMost Accessed ArticlesMost Downloaded ArticlesMost Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Copyright Transfer Form

Case Report
Online Published: 10 Oct 2021
 


A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report

Nikhila Chandramohan, Swetha A, Priyanka Shivanand.


Abstract
Several surgical techniques including pedicle flaps and free soft-tissue grafts have been indicated for the treatment of gingival recession with different success rates. Localized gingival recessions can be managed with various root coverage procedures, more specifically, using the coronally advanced flap with distinct designs. But recently, minimally invasive techniques have gained much importance because of lower patient morbidity and comparable results to conventional techniques. A recent innovation, the Pinhole surgical technique was shown to offer definitive advantages in terms of predictability, postoperative morbidity and patient satisfaction. This case report aims at comparing the modified triangular type of coronally advanced flap with PST to treat bilateral isolated Miller's class I defect in both the maxillary canines by a split-mouth design.

Key words: Coronally advanced flap, gingival recession, pin hole technique, root coverage


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Nikhila Chandramohan
Articles by Swetha A
Articles by Priyanka Shivanand
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Chandramohan N, A S, Shivanand P. A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2021; 5(9): 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422

Web Style

Chandramohan N, A S, Shivanand P. A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. https://www.mdpub.net/?mno=97422 [Access: October 14, 2024]. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Chandramohan N, A S, Shivanand P. A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2021; 5(9): 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Chandramohan N, A S, Shivanand P. A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. (2021), [cited October 14, 2024]; 5(9): 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


Harvard Style

Chandramohan, N., A, . S. & Shivanand, . P. (2021) A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. Int J Med Rev Case Rep, 5 (9), 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


Turabian Style

Chandramohan, Nikhila, Swetha A, and Priyanka Shivanand. 2021. A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 5 (9), 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


Chicago Style

Chandramohan, Nikhila, Swetha A, and Priyanka Shivanand. "A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report." International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports 5 (2021), 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Chandramohan, Nikhila, Swetha A, and Priyanka Shivanand. "A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report." International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports 5.9 (2021), 67-72. Print. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Chandramohan, N., A, . S. & Shivanand, . P. (2021) A split mouth comparison of minimally invasive v/s conventional technique for gingival rejuvenation – A case report. International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 5 (9), 67-72. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.gingival-rejuvenation-97422


Author LoginReviewer LoginAbout PublisherEditorial PoliciesEditorial Review PolicyPeer Review PolicyEditorial & Peer Review ProcessAuthor's Rights and ObligationsPublication Ethics and Publication Malpractice StatementConflict of Interest PolicyPlagiarism PolicyProtection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Privacy PolicyCorrections, Retractions & Expressions of ConcernSelf-Archiving PoliciesDigital Archiving & Preservation PoliciesStatement of Informed ConsentAdvertising PolicyTerms of UseLicense InformationCopyright Information

About International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports

International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports  (Int J Med Rev Case Rep)ISSN: 2534-9821The International Journal of Medical Reviews and Ca ... Read more.



For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.

Contact Information


Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the manuscript submission process should be sent to the International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports editorial office as follows:

Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons (BAYS);

National Center of Public Health and Analyses (NCPHA), floor 2, office № 31,  Sofia 1431, Bulgaria.

inkov@journalmedica.com

Financial department is managed by International Sci Ink Press. 

It is a company registered in Bulgaria with registered no. 205414288 and registered address at 57 Antim I str., Vazrazhdane, Sofia, 1303, Bulgaria.

Tel: +359883427500