E-ISSN 2534-9821
 

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
05 / 01 / 2023

 


A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus

Seema, Sangeeta Singh.


Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients who had vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine enlargement.
Methods: For two years, 50 vaginal hysterectomies were compared to 50 abdominal hysterectomies in a prospective study. Patients' characteristics before, during, and after operations were reviewed and tracked for three months to assess post-operative complications.
Results: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of patient age, parity, uterine size, or intraoperative complications. The vaginal hysterectomy group had a lower operating time, blood loss, post-op demand for analgesia, and hospital stay duration than the abdominal hysterectomy group. TAH was associated with significantly more complications than vaginal hysterectomy.
Conclusion: In the treatment of benign gynaecological disease, vaginal hysterectomy is more effective and safer than abdominal hysterectomy, with greater efficacy and safety even for enlarged and non-prolapsed uteri.

Key words: vaginal hysterectomies, benign gynaecological disease, pelvic adhesions


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Seema
Articles by Sangeeta Singh
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Seema, Singh S. A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2022; 6(19): 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080


Web Style

Seema, Singh S. A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. https://www.mdpub.net/?mno=115606 [Access: April 04, 2024]. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Seema, Singh S. A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2022; 6(19): 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Seema, Singh S. A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. (2022), [cited April 04, 2024]; 6(19): 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080



Harvard Style

Seema & Singh, . S. (2022) A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. Int J Med Rev Case Rep, 6 (19), 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080



Turabian Style

Seema, and Sangeeta Singh. 2022. A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 6 (19), 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080



Chicago Style

Seema, and Sangeeta Singh. "A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus." International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports 6 (2022), 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Seema, and Sangeeta Singh. "A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus." International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports 6.19 (2022), 38-41. Print. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Seema & Singh, . S. (2022) A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 6 (19), 38-41. doi:10.5455/IJMRCR.172-1663604080